Legalization of marijuana possession and use for medicinal purposes has been approved in Florida following a 71% majority vote in Florida. If you are caught possessing the substance, however, without a valid medical marijuana identification card and prescription, don’t expect to use the “I was using it for medicinal purposes” excuse.
Not a defense to arrests for drug possession
Even prior to enactment, our criminal defense law firm in South Florida received numerous calls from individuals who’d been arrested for possessing marijuana who wished to defend the charges by claiming their use was medicinal in nature. Many believed that the fact that they were using it for “medical” reasons might be some form of defense following an arrest, however, this is simply not the case claims Defense Lawyer William Moore who practices in Fort Lauderdale.
May Legally Possess Marijuana if Criteria Met
Under Florida’s medical marijuana laws, it is not a crime to obtain specially grown low-grade marijuana provided that you meet certain requirements. Specifically, only individuals suffering from a debilitating medical condition who are under the care of a licensed Florida physician. Florida residents wishing to obtain the drug must have a written certification from their physician to this effect and must also be in possession of a lawfully obtained medical marijuana ID card. Even then, it is not within the discretion of the afflicted to possess any strain marijuana other than that which has been grown by one of the few licensed nurseries regulated by the state and dispensed by a licensed distributor.
Must Possess State Regulated Dispensed Marijuana
I anticipate that we will see cases involving individuals with all of the valid credentials who were arrested for possessing marijuana that was purchased from a dealer as opposed to a dispensary for which they were written a prescription. It will be much the same situation as when someone is arrested for possessing prescription medication that is of the same type for which they are prescribed but not the same milligram. In those cases, the defendant is not shielded from illegally possessing a substance that was obtained from some other source than a pharmacy in conformance with their script. For example, if you have a 40 mg OxyContin in your possession and you try to defend on the basis that you are prescribed the medication, that defense will fail if your prescription is for 80 mg. – William Moore
Police Officers Trained to Recognise
We can expect that police officers will be trained extensively when it comes to being able to identify medically prescribed marijuana as opposed to “street level.” It will be interesting to see how this all unfolds. I think that when it comes to people on probation, individuals entitled to legally possess the substance may be shielded from random drug tests provided there probation terms allow them to continue using marijuana as part of their prescribed treatment claims Moore.
Questions for the attorney:
Questions regarding the legality of possessing marijuana for medicinal purposes should be directed to attorney William Moore at one financial Plaza, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 or by calling 954-523-5333. William Moore has defended drug crimes in South Florida for the past 20 years and is an avid speaker and writer on criminal defense litigation and strategy pertaining to drug cases.
The race to grow low potency marijuana & the slow pace of researchers who want to know why smoking it makes people feel better. The first step proposed by Florida lawmakers was to all but eliminate the compound responsible for inducing a pleasurable state after “being prescribed” the controversial substance.
We already know what recent polls have confirmed; a vast majority of Floridians will support medical marijuana when it is readdressed in 2016. The fact is by this time next year, marijuana will be widely doled out by physicians carrying the special license required to prescribe it.
Currently, the state is considering a low potency form of the drug only. The goal is to minimize the euphoric effects commonly experienced by recreational pot smokers and produce a low THC pharmaceutical grade product. Contrary to popular belief, prescription marijuana is to be grown within the state of Florida and under strict guidelines. “Only five nurseries will be licensed to grow cannabis” claims Drug Crime Defense Lawyer William Moore. The cost of an administrative agency to oversee the production phase is expected to cost several million dollars annually. The revenue to the will be in the billions.
Over 100 nurseries have applied for the handful of growing licenses that will be issued based on predetermined geographical regions. The Florida State Health Department will only consider long-standing businesses with decades of experience and a history of legal commercial plant production. Applicants will have to show a history of almost a half-million plants grown annually. The fee for application is in excess of $50,000.00. Nurseries selected will be licensed to grow strains that are low in Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). Advocates for the legalization of marijuana argue that THC, the compound responsible for the euphoric effect of marijuana, is the active ingredient required by patients expected to be prescribed the drug.
Little is understood about what it is exactly about marijuana that alleviates pain and promotes appetite for those suffering from debilitating illnesses. Cannabis has been classified by the United States federal government as a drug without any medical use for decades. Very little research has been conducted with regard to if, how or why it helps patients suffering from serious conditions… the legalization of medical marijuana in certain states throughout the nation has started the ever-so-slow process of researching just what it is about smoking pot that seems to alleviate pain suffered by those who have been diagnosed with cancer, epilepsy or similar conditions.
It may seem strange but the FDA has not approved marijuana as a safe and effective drug for any medical condition. In a formal statement however, the organization publicly stated that it is aware that there is considerable interest in its use to attempt to treat a number of medical conditions.
“Good to know that the Food & Drug Administration is aware that people who have known only sickness and suffering are interested in smoking some pot. Years from now perhaps a scientist in a lab coat conducting FDA supported research is going to look up from a bubbling beaker and suggest to the rest of the team ‘Hey guys, I really think it’s the THC that made these patients feel better… now if we could only find out what brought on the sudden appetite for buffalo wings and pizza.” – William R. Moore, Marijuana Defense Lawyer in Fort Lauderdale.
Many people don’t realize that following Prohibition almost a century ago, there were constitutional protections that actually stood in the way of our government’s unrelenting desire to criminalize the possession, use or sale of marijuana. Today’s generation has been raised during a relatively consistent climate of tolerance toward the drug and in fact has seen its use slowly becoming legalized. Even when in Fatah clique criminalized, possession of cannabis is the only significant drug crime that is not charged as a felony. If you’re caught possessing ganja, anyone will tell you that it’s one of the lowest level offenses out there. Furthermore, in comparison to other scheduled substances which are illegal to possess, you can possess quite a lot of it before you’re kicked up into the felony court rooms. If you’re holding under 20 g of marijuana, you will be treated no harsher than if an officer had discovered a tiny roach on the floor board of your car while conducting a traffic stop.
“There was a time when the famous green leafy substance was public enemy number one in the government did some really goofy stuff in trying to do away with it. The government also did some really shady stuff.”
Facts about a time before grass was ever criminalized
False propaganda campaigns, substance regulation and eventual enactment of criminal laws prohibiting the possession and use of pot.
Prior to criminalizing the possession and sale of marijuana, the United States government attempted to use scare tactics to dissuade use of the drug.
Although taken very seriously by the public at the time, Reefer Madness and other idiotic propaganda campaigns that are routinely laughed at even to this day.
The unrelated case of Victor Licata Victor Licata was not even 30 years old when the state of Florida arrested and charged him with committing unspeakable and violent crimes. Specifically, Mr. Licata murdered his mother, father, two brothers and a sister in cold blood. All of the aforementioned victims were killed with an axe. His actions were blamed on a sole witnesses account that he had smoked marijuana and it was after doing so that he became so enraged by the influence of the drug that he hacked up his entire family one by one.
Of course none of this was true, The young Florida man, in actuality, murdered his entire family because he suffered from significant mental illness and had for a majority of his life. The government however, sided with the marijuana explanation and discounted any evidence of significant mental illness for reasons that can only be explained by one simple thing:
This is just the kind of guy that the feds wanted as the poster child for their war against cannibis. Following the gruesome murders, it was widely publicized that the smoking of a marijuana cigarette was the sole cause of a young man’s chopping up an entire Florida American family… His family.
Reefer Madness: the war against refer hits the silver screen following the above-mentioned killings and subsequent use of such a gruesome tragedy to further government interest, are then chosen leaders saw yet another opportunity to support the dangers of marijuana, corroborate and associate the drug with violent and unspeakable acts in a way that would be disseminated loud and clear among the masses. By the masses I mean the good people of America.
reefer madness was a film that can only be described as incredibly biased propaganda that was also idiotic in its fabrication which I know things whatsoever. Our government was having a hard time making grass illegal and so what they did, among other things, was to produce a movie that claim to show firsthand how smoking even a couple puffs of cannabis will undoubtedly transform the user into a psychopathic killer, rapist or induce almost immediate suicide.
Attorney William R. Moore admits that he has referenced the actions of our government during this time in American History in defending drug cases in Broward County Florida. You only have to take a step back, and look at some of the recent behaviors of certain Florida officials and policing powers to see traces of almost equally embarrassing government actions. Steps taken in furtherance of some necessary but somehow misunderstood holy crusade.
“let’s see what did we have a couple of month’s ago? Oh yes, a couple months ago we had Broward County Sheriff’s officers and even our mayor criminalizing any feeding of the poor. I can’t begin to tell you how ridiculous this is on so many levels aside from all that can be said about the inhumanity of such actions the part of our government.”
Marijuana defense lawyer William R. Moore had stated publicly following the County of Broward’s attempt at charge to anyone who prepared a meal for our local homeless population what a profound affect the whole action had on him.
“I not only knew some of the officers having been born and raised in Broward County Florida, but had also been politically involved in the now Fort Lauderdale Mayor’s early elections. I walked door to door for this guy when he ran for office in Wilton manors almost 20 years ago. I never could have imagined that he would stand in front of television cameras and emphatically argue why the criminalizing of even the smallest of humanitarian acts is not only right and just but also makes sense.”
Attorney Moore points out that any support of the less fortunate, chemically dependent or criminally accused is not going to be well received by law enforcement in Broward County.
“Didn’t we just have a judge comment on a well-prepared motion to lawyers who defend individuals charged with crimes while they are still presumed innocent. Didn’t the Broward County State Atty.’s office rain fire down on this well respected gentlemen despite the fact that he’d only been a judge for a couple of weeks?”
It’s a Looney government all over again.
I know that it’s hard to believe, but the truth is that when people watched the movie Reefer madness so many years ago, they actually believed that smoking marijuana would immediately cause you to involuntarily murder someone, rape someone or jump off of a building and to your death.
Untrue propaganda followed by laws criminalizing marijuana. Our criminal defense law firm will be following up to this article with a historical account of the legal maneuvering by the United States government in there eventually succeeding in criminalizing marijuana. Look for next week’s article on our criminal defense blog and accompanying video, which will be posted on our YouTube channel alongside other criminal defense lecture films and productions. If you have any questions regarding the historical account of the criminalizing of marijuana in either the state of Florida on the state level or by the United States on the federal level, do not hesitate to contactcriminal defense attorney William Moore at his office in Broward County Florida or by calling 954-523-5223.
As investigations (both public and private) of the Broward Crime Lab continue, local criminal defense attorneys are challenging drug cases in droves.
The first step according to William Moore, a drug possession defense lawyer, is to independently weigh drugs in their respective cases, obviously. While some lawyers are reserving aggressive investigation of drug offenses offenses to those which involved suspected chemist MacDonald, most agree that all drug handling and testing conducted by BSO should be considered suspect. Moore agrees that the latter is the better practice.
Our faith in the Broward Crime Lab has been compromised. According to Attorney William Moore, this is further aggravated by investigations that fall short of those of independent entities such as New Times Magazine. A staple news source that has focused on uncovering local scandals in Broward County for decades.
Recent Investigation of Broward County Crime Lab Conducted by New Times Magazine
Though the broad outlines of the scandal at the Broward crime lab have been made public — two top staff members have resigned, and an internal affairs investigation is underway — New Times has learned it is likely more far-reaching than previously thought. An audit expected later this year is likely to show that drugs are missing in many more cases.
After reviewing hundreds of pages of court documents and police reports, the newspaper has found problems in everything from street-level drug busts to large-scale probes of heavy movers. Among them are Roberts’ case and several others, including:
• The bust of a dealer with 363 pills that were field-tested as positive for MDMA in 2012, only to come up negative in the lab.
• A $60,000 Fort Lauderdale reverse sting conducted in 2012 in which cocaine was later found to be missing.
• The 2013 seizure, after a SWAT standoff, of marijuana that was listed at a different weight in police reports and lab analysis.
The common factor: All the drugs landed on the desk of forensic chemist Kelli McDonald. She is still employed at the Broward Sheriff’s Office but was recently transferred and could not be reached for comment. Her last known annual salary was $85,800 in 2012.
“There seem to be multiple manners in which she has engaged in misconduct,” says Gordon Weekes, a chief assistant with the Broward Public Defender’s Office. “It creates an issue because it erodes the confidence of the entire criminal justice system.”
The Broward lab hired its first chemist to do drug testing in the late 1960s. During the ’70s, the county established six laboratories that were funded in part by the state. Today, there are five units — chemistry, DNA, evidence intake, latent print, and firearms — and a $4.7 million annual budget. But the workload is considerable for the lab’s 37-person staff, especially considering demographics. According to a 2010 presentation, Broward’s drug unit has one analyst for every 319,925 county residents. In Palm Beach County, each analyst serves 253,290 residents; in Miami Dade, the ratio is one to 238,717.
There is a serious danger in overworking crime lab staff. Recent history has shown that the more law enforcement relies on science for convictions, the more vulnerable the system becomes to bad acts by the folks in lab coats.
The State of Florida is currently reviewing thousands of cases worked by technician Joseph Graves. In February, the former Florida Department of Law Enforcement employee was arrested for allegedly switching out the prescription pain pills he tested at a Pensacola crime laboratory with over-the-counter substitutes. Since he was hired in 2005, Graves had worked more than 2,600 cases for FDLE involving 35 counties across the state.
McDonald was hired at the Broward Sheriff’s lab in 2006 after spending three years as a tech for the Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office. She had earned a bachelor’s degree in forensic science from the University of Central Florida in 2000 and a master’s degree in biomedical science from Florida Atlantic University in 2005. In her first five years in Broward, McDonald received positive marks in her reviews and glowing responses from colleagues. She has analyzed drugs in about 5,900 cases from 2006 to this past February, when she was suspended.
But in February 2012, 0.4 grams of crack cocaine — about the weight of a pencil eraser — went missing from the lab. The material was part of a case McDonald was working, and the tech was the last person to have signed the material out of the property vault. McDonald denied any knowledge of the missing drugs. Lab staff thoroughly searched her workstation and the vault but couldn’t find a trace of the absent evidence.
The case of the missing crack was referred to the Broward Sheriff’s Division of Internal Affairs. Investigators couldn’t turn up an explanation. As the last person to handle the material, McDonald was found to have failed to meet BSO standards. The internal-affairs case was closed in October 2012; McDonald was given the recommended discipline of “counseling and policy review” — neither of which she received, according to her own statements in a later deposition.
But the episode put the Broward Public Defender’s Office on notice. When McDonald’s name came up in a case involving cocaine seized in a Hallandale Beach house raid in 2013, the office hired an outside drug tester. McDonald’s original crime laboratory analysis noted the presence of 16.3 grams of cocaine. The public defender’s expert found 10.98 grams.
The discrepancy was brought to the attention of the lab’s manager, Dr. James Ongley; he ordered a random reweighing of 20 cases McDonald worked in 2012. Nineteen checked out. In one case, McDonald had originally recorded the presence of 1,012.6 grams of cocaine. The reweigh totaled 998.3 grams. Ongley reported the discrepancy to BSO’s Internal Affairs Unit, and a new investigation was opened.
McDonald was reassigned to a desk job in February 2014. A month later, Ongley and McDonald’s former supervisor, Randy Hilliard, resigned.
BSO is currently reviewing all 5,900 cases McDonald worked between 2006 and 2014. And as the paper trail New Times uncovered shows, the weight discrepancies go far beyond a few missing grams of crack.
In July 2010, after Roberts was handcuffed at her friend’s condo in North Lauderdale, BSO deputies tore into the UPS box. Inside they found “approximately 38 lbs of marijuana” wrapped in green cellophane, records show.
Later, Roberts admitted that she had planned to hide the pot in a hollowed-out space under the hood of her silver 2006 Land Rover. She was going to deliver the drugs to a third party, whom she refused to name.
But as the defendant was being charged with trafficking, the amount of marijuana changed. In a supplemental report prepared on July 19, a detective wrote that BSO had found “approximately 31 pounds (14.06 kilograms) of suspect marijuana” in the UPS box. Nine days later, when McDonald weighed the drugs at the crime laboratory, she recorded only 28.1 pounds.
Although Roberts was originally charged with felony trafficking, prosecutors were forced to retreat, and she pleaded no contest to a possession charge this past June. She got a single day of probation.
A second controversial case began on June 28, 2012, when Fort Lauderdale Police detectives fitted out a criminal informant for a sting on a suspected drug dealer named Andres Reyes at SW Fifth Street and 18th Avenue. As officers monitored the scene, an informant gave Reyes money for a black leather pouch containing pills.
Police then arrested Reyes and field-tested the 363 pills found in the pouch. They came back positive for MDMA.
But on July 18, the same drugs were tested by McDonald at the crime laboratory. She found “no controlled substance.” In a deposition with the public defender, the Fort Lauderdale detective who conducted the field-test reported he was “100 percent” sure the test at the scene showed MDMA. He also recalled — but couldn’t say for sure — that the drugs taken from Reyes were compressed tablets, like aspirin. According to pictures taken by the public defender, the pills in the lab’s vault under Reyes’ case number are capsules.
Prosecutors dropped the MDMA charge against Reyes, but a possession charge is pending for a joint he had in his pocket.
A third case was initiated a month later, on August 15, when undercover Fort Lauderdale Police detectives brought two kilos of real cocaine to a meeting with Juan Alberto Rodriguez, Frank Osme, Patrick Duplessy, and Luciana Parham. The buyers brought $60,000.
After the four paid the cops and were arrested, the two kilos of bait were submitted to the crime lab, where McDonald tested and weighed one of the bricks, noting 930.7 grams. As the case ground through the legal system, the public defender hired an outside analyst to reweigh the cocaine. This time, there were 924.78 grams.
Rodriguez and one of his codefendants pleaded no contest to cocaine trafficking and conspiracy in late July. Their sentencing date is scheduled for September. Two additional defendants pleaded guilty in 2012 but have yet to be sentenced.
Perhaps most interesting, though, is the case of Yellow Cab driver Wilner Telcius, who was trying to collect a $6 fare from drunk passenger Joel Troxell on August 4, 2013, when things got weird. Troxell declined to pay, then waved around a .357 magnum, and Telcius called the cops. After a standoff including a SWAT team, cops found “76.2 grams of… cannabis in (2) plastic bags.”
After Troxell was charged (the case is ongoing), McDonald tested the drugs on August 8 and found only 55.6 grams.
BSO is still investigating McDonald and declined to comment on these cases.
Prosecutor Jeff Marcus says his office has retested drugs in cases as they go to trial. “We haven’t been dismissing cases,” he says. “[But] the crime lab is down a chemist, and they’ve been swamped with all their work.”
At the Public Defender’s Office, however, attorneys continue to comb through cases McDonald worked. Says chief assistant Weekes: “When you have a chemist that is engaging in chronic misconduct, it becomes an issue of confidence in a fair trial.”
For updates on the ongoing criminal investigation and projected costs to the State of Florida may be obtained by contacting Attorney William Moore in Broward County.
On Tuesday August 19, 2014 Broward sheriff’s deputies reported confiscating $150,000 worth cannabis plants from a home in Oakland Park Florida. Prior to a search warrant granted earlier that morning police reported finding and removing 152 cannabis plants ranging from seedlings to 5 feet high plants. As of right now the investigation is still underway. Currently there is one woman in custody and a second individual has been detained for questioning. Broward County sheriff’s spokeswoman, Dani Moschella, states the house has been under investigation for several weeks.
Local residence and neighbors claim to have never seen anyone residing in the home stating they actually thought it was haunted or a crime was committed causing the home to remain vacant. Residents were shocked to see at 7am 20 deputies entering the property with blue gloves. Shortly after the search and seizure FP&L was seen cutting off the power to the home.
Detectives identified the woman living in an apartment attached to the home and witnessed her entering the side of the house where the plants were being cultivated. The name of the woman arrested has not been released however she may face multiple drug offense charges.
According to drug defense attorney William Moore this type of case may result in multiple drug charges such as cultivation of marijuana, trafficking in marijuana, possession of marijuana and possession with intent to sell. If prosecuted these charges will most likely result in felony prosecution with possible mandatory prison sentences.
20 years ago, it was not uncommon to see prosecuting attorneys in possession of illicit materials that served as evidence intended to be used at trial.
I distinctly remember a somewhat lax overseeing of evidence in the form of controlled substances which was depended upon by both myself and fellow prosecutors to prove drug cases in the 1990s.
William and his law partners all worked as prosecuting attorneys together almost 20 years ago. While one of his partners focused on prosecuting sex crimes and the other DUI, Attorney Moore prosecuted primarily drug related offenses. Both he and another assistant state attorney used to comment on how it seemed uncomfortable to be given custody of a Ziploc evidence bag full of cocaine and walk it to and from court for trial.
Moore admits that standard procedure was to have a Broward County law enforcement officer present during the transport of controlled substances to and from the courtroom, there were several occasions where a deputy simply interested both myself or my trial partner to carry evidence bags containing controlled substances to an evidence locker when trial proceedings ran late into the evening.
Keep in mind that this was almost 20 years ago claims Moore. I seem to remember that we were treated somewhat like fellow police officers back then. Neither myself or any of my former colleagues recall even a hint of any mishandling of controlled substances but all agree that it seemed weird at the time as we were all just over 20 years old.
I am sure that much has changed in the way of procedure for handling drug evidence by Broward County prosecuting attorneys.
Two decades ago my law partner’s and I have memories of the rare occasions where a Prosecutors who were in the middle of trial had sealed evidence bags full of either drugs or contraband on their dark brown laminated government desk.
I can only imagine how lax supervision must have been at the Broward County crime lab in those days claims Moore, a former Broward County Prosecutor.
During all my years serving as a prosecuting criminal attorney for the county of Broward, neither I nor my criminal law partners recall even a hint of an allegation that a prosecutor mishandled evidence.
Intended Purpose of Broward County Crime Lab
The Broward County crime lab exists to secure substances, preserving a chain of custody in anticipation of using those substances as evidence in prosecuting individuals for violating criminal drug laws and or possessing controlled substances considered dangerous. More importantly, the crime lab is used for both the testing and weighing of substances intended to be used against an accused person.
According to Broward County drug possession lawyer William Moore, our Florida criminal statutes outline the level, degree and severity of offenses involving controlled substances, contraband or even items such as firearms alleged to have been used in the commission of a crime or possessed by a convicted felon.
Both the nature and wait of a substance becomes very important in both the prosecution and defense of drug crimes in Broward County according to attorney William Moore. The difference in terms of exposure for an accused can be staggering. Similarly, in cases involving firearms, operability is something that must be proven by the state attorney.
The Broward County Prosecutor’s Burden of Proof
The Broward State Atttorney charged with prosecuting either a drug or firearms case must be able to prove that a substance was in fact cocaine where a defendant is charged with possessing cocaine. This requires opinion testimony which can only be provided by an expert witness who tested the substance. Likewise, in order to succeed on certain firearm cases, the prosecuting attorney must be able to prove that the firearm was operational.
All of this testing is conducted by experts working for the state right there in the Broward County Crime Lab. it’s one of the few things that can be considered convenient for an attorney prosecuting cases for the government.
Currently, the Broward County crime lab employs 37 analysts, clerical staff and evidence intake clerks who oversee the handling, storage and testing of evidence where required. A $5 million budget is allotted to the lab. A portion of these funds are provided by the Florida Department of law enforcement and the national institutes of justice according to attorney Moore.
Use of of experts in preparation of defense by criminal lawyers, by Criminal Lawyer William Moore.
The preparing of a case in defense of an accused varies according to crime type and specific facts. To an accused the process can seem both confusing and overwhelming. To an attorney who has been exclusively engaged in the practice of criminal law, the entire process is second nature. One obvious element to defense case preparation is a thorough review of all evidence regardless of that evidences admissibility. This is because even irrelevant evidence may lead to the discovery of information that tends to strengthen or even establish a viable defense that can be the difference between exoneration and conviction for committing a crime.
Investigating, Discovering and Effectively Presenting Favorable Evidence by a Defending Attorney.
Experienced Criminal Defense Lawyers often use professionals in investigating, discovering and effectively presenting favorable evidence. Expert testimony that favors the defendant may be used by the defending attorney not only in preparation of trial, but also in negotiating a breakdown or even dismissal of the criminal charges against the defendant of whom they represent. The determination to use an expert in the preparation of a client’s defense is often based on rules governing the admissibility of evidence under Florida Criminal Law. This is because opinions may not be expressed and introduced as evidence by witnesses during a criminal jury trial unless they qualify as and are declared an expert by the court. Under Florida criminal law, experts may only testify about their opinions if they fall under their area of expertise. The use of experts out of necessity required significant forward thinking on the part of the criminal defense attorney charged with defending an accused client. It is considered malpractice on the part of the defending lawyer in most circumstances whereby convincing opinion evidence is declared inadmissible simply because counsel was unfamiliar with our Florida Criminal Statutes specific to opinion testimony.
Examples of when a criminal defense lawyer would require an expert in order to present evidence in a criminal trial under Florida law:
– Where an attorney represents a defendant who is charged with possession of a controlled substance and there is evidence that the sophisticated instruments used to test the substance were not maintained, calibrated or operated correctly. – Where the defendant is alleged to have committed a sexual battery on an alleged victim which is corroborated by DNA testing and it is learned by the representing criminal lawyer that the DNA may have been cross-contaminated. – Where a defendant is accused of DUIManslaughter and represented by a criminal lawyer who wishes to present tire skid-mark and headlamp impact-burn evidence that the accident was caused by the victim. All of the examples above are similar to evidence issues confronted by our lawyers on a regular basis. Each illustration requires the use of an expert in order to preserve, present exculpatory evidence because: – what a lawyer says in trial is not considered evidence. – a lawyer may not comment on facts or opinions not in evidence. – opinion testimony may only be introduced into evidence through a qualified expert. Lawyers who practice criminal law should employ the use of experts in most circumstances where the client’s resources allow. A few criminal defense law firms employ experts where the area of defense is limited to a specific crime type such as DUI, sex crime and complex fraud or white collar crime.
Advice to Criminal Lawyers in Broward regarding Qualifying Experts
Always remember to explain admissibility issues with the client where an expert is being retained for the purpose of testifying on behalf of the defense at an up and coming trial. Florida criminal courts are generally lenient when it comes to qualifying a witness as an expert. This is most often beneficial to the defense, unless of course, where it is the prosecution who seeks to have an expert certified as same. Certain criminal judges in Broward County have developed a reputation for requiring that the intended expert require significant credentials in order to offer opinion testimony. Many judges have refused to allow costly experts to testify. If this is even a remote possibility, it is always advisable to prepare the client in advance. Where experts are not independently employed by a defense law firm, a client must be informed prior to their financing an expert’s testimony.
William Moore Criminal Defense Attorneys have utilized experts of all kinds over the years. For a list of experts commonly employed by criminal lawyers in preparing and arguing the defense of a defendant, see the followup post to this article. William Moore is a lawyer with William Moore Criminal Defense Attorneys: 1 Financial Plaza #2500 Fort Lauderdale FL 33394 (954) 523-5333 Email Attorney William R. Moore at firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com Satellite Office: William Moore Criminal Defense Attorneys: 721 SE 13th St Fort Lauderdale FL 33316 (954) 656-6229
In the state of Florida a drug conviction will vary from a misdemeanor to felony, depending on how much and what drug(s) the minor had in their possession.
If you or your child is facing drug charges in Broward County, It is very important to contact an criminal defense attorney immediately. These types of cases are very serious and should not be ignored.
The type of drug the minor had in his or her possession will determine what type of charges they may face. Possession of cocaine or herion are viewed as more “dangerous drugs” and could result in harsher sentencing. Drugs such as marijuana most likely will result is a less harsh sentence. However, the amount of drug the minor is possession will determine whether the junviniele faces drug dealing charges or intent to distribute.